Guide 2 — report in hand
Types of blood tests: the main panels and what each measures
The main types of blood tests come in panels: blood count, metabolic, lipid, liver, kidney, thyroid, iron. What each one measures and what it leaves open.
Key figures
- 251,891
- participants in the Cochrane review: general health checks did not reduce mortality[1]
- +20%
- more new diagnoses over six years in people offered checks, with no better outcomes[2]
- 29
- guidelines compared on iron deficiency, with widely varying thresholds[6]
- 30 µg/L
- ferritin threshold from a Swiss consensus, often above the lower limit printed on a report[7]
A panel is a group, not a list
What arrives as thirty numbered lines is really a handful of small panels, and inside each one the lines are meant to be read against each other. Hemoglobin with MCV and ferritin. ALT with AST and GGT. Creatinine with eGFR and your hydration.
That is why reading a report top to bottom rarely works, and why each page here explains a panel rather than a marker.
Why a single value says little
A single out-of-range number, read on its own, is the quickest way to the wrong conclusion. The same raised ALT does not mean the same thing after a bout of flu, after a heavy dinner, or after starting a new medicine.
So every page in this section starts from the group: which lines make it up, which one is read first, and which combinations are worth a question to your doctor.
What a routine panel shows, and what it does not
Routine blood work describes how a few large systems are behaving today: blood cells, sugar, kidneys, liver, thyroid, lipids, iron. It is not a cancer screen, it does not test for most infections, and it leaves out vitamin D or B12 unless they were asked for.
More lines do not buy more protection. A Cochrane systematic review of 17 randomized trials and 251,891 participants found that general health checks offered to adults had no effect on total, cancer or cardiovascular mortality. In one of those trials, people offered checks received 20% more new diagnoses over six years, without any change in outcomes.
Some lines are fragile for technical reasons rather than medical ones. Potassium is the classic case: red cells damaged during collection release it into the sample and raise the result, which is why laboratories measure the degree of hemolysis and reject samples beyond a threshold.
Four readings that changed recently
Four lines are read differently today than a few years ago, which matters whenever you compare a new report with an older one.
- LipidsSince 2016, European guidance measures them without fasting by default: after an ordinary meal, triglycerides move little and HDL not at all.
- KidneysIn 2021 a joint US task force recommended a creatinine equation without the race variable, so an older eGFR and a recent one may not be calculated the same way.
- IronThresholds for iron deficiency vary widely across 29 guidelines; a Swiss consensus places ferritin at 30 µg/L in people without inflammation.
- ThyroidFor a raised TSH with a normal free T4, a 2023 review finds no proof that hormone replacement helps; age, symptoms and the TSH level decide.
Where to start
If your report is a long sheet, begin with the full blood panel guide, which explains how the groups fit together and what a check-up can and cannot tell you. Then go to the group that carries your flagged lines: blood count, metabolic panel, lipids, liver, kidneys, thyroid or iron.
The articles in this guide
Your own results
Your blood test results, explained line by line
Upload your lab report: in a few minutes, the full report sorts every marker by what needs attention, against the ranges printed by your own laboratory, explains each one, and ends with an action plan and questions for your doctor.
- Your name is removed before the reading
- Never used to train an AI, never resold
- Delete a report, or your account, at any time
PDF or photo · several files accepted · See an example report
Sources
Guidelines, consensus statements and peer-reviewed studies. Every figure on this page comes from one of them. Preprints are not cited.
- Systematic review
General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease
- Systematic review
- Verification study
- Consensus statement
- Recommendation
- Systematic review
Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of iron deficiency across indications: a systematic review
- Expert consensus
- Review